Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Andymarek/Journal Community Publishing Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was move to mainspace and redirect, reasonable solution with no objections - agreed to by the nominator. (non-admin close) Guest9999 (talk) 23:54, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Closing instructions

User:Andymarek/Journal Community Publishing Group
User inactive since 2007. Page not edited since 2007. Unlikely to be missed. Delete per WP:UP. Vicenarian (T · C) 18:14, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Any reason this shouldn't be moved into mainspace? Seems to pass WP:CORP as a significant subsidiary of a notable company.  69.212.204.13 (talk) 23:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The material has already been merged to the parent company Journal Communications. Move thisd to mainspace, and turn it into a redirect, since its a reasonable search term. DGG (talk) 03:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Again, no objection. Vicenarian  (T · C) 03:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Inactivity is a very poor rationale for deleting someone's userspace content. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed so, on its own. The inactivity, however, was noted simply to state that the user in question is not likely to object to any deletions/merging/redirects - and thus an MfD would not violate the latitude usually given to the userspace of active editors. Vicenarian  (T · C) 07:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I like to think that people like Andy will return. I think that if he returns to find his userspace deleted, he will find it unwelcoming.  I think it is better, if you find apparently forgotten and never-to-be-used-again userpages, to convert them to redirects to the main userpage, than to have them deleted.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair point. I'll keep that in mind. Thanks. Vicenarian  (T · C) 14:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.