Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Angela Morgan/sandtestbox




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Only edits by this indef blocked sock user were to this and another now-deleted subpage. This seems a clear-cut uncontroversial deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Angela Morgan/sandtestbox
Mega amount of spam from a sockpuppet account andyzweb (talk) 05:44, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like secret game page to me. Not SPAM, though . Collect (talk) 15:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, whatever it is, it's not helping the encyclopedia, especially as it's a subpage of a sockpuppet; I'd guess that it's a massive test page. In case you're curious — by my calculations, there are 1,151,144 characters on the page (not including the deletion template).  Nyttend (talk) 01:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too big.  I had to reboot my computer.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:25, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a repository of links (even though the links are dead). The page is also not encyclopedia-related (it doesn't contribute in any way to the functioning of the encyclopedia, falling foul of the userpage policy) and patent nonsense (well, I can't garner any meaning out of it!). JulieSpaulding (talk) 06:20, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.