Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Angelbo/Draft of Regiments of Denmark

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 16:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Angelbo/Draft of Regiments of Denmark


6 year old stale draft in Danish (for the bit that is there). Legacypac (talk) 02:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Replace with Inactive userpage blanked. Barely any material there, but clearly is the start of the user's idea for building content.  Although the user has been inactive for a long time, there is no advantage to assuming he will not return, preventing his access to his old ideas, and making his returned unwelcomed.  There are no problems with the minimal content.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing imaginably acceptable, account now seems to be retired. SwisterTwister   talk  06:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * What benefit to the project does such a deletion provide? A2soup (talk) 16:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Move to Regiments of Denmark and make it into a redirect to List of Danish regiments. Same topic, plausible redirect, so rather than creating a redirect separately, might as well keep this old history somewhere. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as super old stuff. No need to keep it indefinitely. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, stale, foreign language, and not likely to go anywhere. Chrisw80 (talk) 22:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.