Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Anna Quist/Anarchist International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was  Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 03:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

User:Anna Quist/Anarchist International
Per Articles for deletion/Anarchist International and Articles for deletion/Anarchist International (2nd nomination), Wikipedia is unlikely to have or benefit from an article on the alleged Norwegian organization "Anarchist International".

User:Anna Quist, the user behind the article, would appear from her contributions to be a single-purpose account with the intention of promoting the organization, and as the deletion log indicates has reposted the article in spite of the Afd's, and continued to do so at The Anarchist International when Anarchist International was salted. Some relevant AN threads for context on the situation are here and here. User:Anna Quist/Sandbox is also included in this MfD as a blanked version of the nom'd article.

I submit that the encyclopedia does not benefit from this use of of userspace. On behalf of the Anarchism task force, Skomorokh  19:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been listed as an Anarchism task force deletion discussion. Skomorokh  19:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been listed as an Anarchism task force deletion discussion. Skomorokh  19:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per Skomorokh's assessment. Article subpage has gone stale (not edited in over 6 weeks), doesn't seem to have even the slightest chance of being an appropriate Wikipedia article, no need to waste usersubspace for it either.  Keeper    76  19:37, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Enough time has been wasted with this situation. Per Skomorokh, Keeper, and the consensus to delete in both AfDs. Its unlikely to be an article, but if it does, it can be userfied again with the intent of establishing notability not previously given.  Syn  ergy 04:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination assessment.--Cast (talk) 21:52, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Hell, I'm mentioned in the article, that should be a warning sign. Zazaban (talk) 22:49, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Same waste of time as before. Mssive consensus that this organization is being promoted by this person, that the information given is totally unreliable, and that the organization does not merit any mention at all anywhere on wikipedia. This draft has no chance at all of ever making it into an article, and, given past history of user, is more than probably a promotional page. --Enric Naval (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Keeper and Enric Naval. Unlikely this will make an appropriate article. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  19:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Pretty clearly inappropriate content that's been userified without the intent to improve it to the point of an acceptable article. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 06:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 09:35, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete And immediately NOINDEX all User:* space related pages to prevent this happening in the future to where it can be detected outside of our site or affect the wider world negatively as easily. There is no reason to include User: pages or sub-pages on Search Engines. This seems to be happening too often now, and it's a waste of our manpower to go hunt down all these problem pages, since we may never catch them all with millions of user accounts. NOINDEX them all, the whole User: name space and subpages, fix the robots.txt filtering to catch any possible combinations of URLs, and bang, problem solved. rootology ( C )( T ) 16:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Skomorokh. Clearly inappopriate use. Glass  Cobra  11:18, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.