Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Annalisa Ventola/Sources for parapsychology

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Blanked. As an inactive userpage. If they come back and want it, it's there; but otherwise it's hidden. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:37, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

User:Annalisa Ventola/Sources for parapsychology


A list of unusable sources for crank ideas compiled by a user who has not edited for a year. The user claims them to meet Wikipedia RS standards, but in fact they don't. For example, many are to Dean Radin, parapsychologist and crank, on his own website. Others are to fringe medical claims that fail MEDRS. Some are fringe journals that fail RS presumptively, e.g. Frontiers titles. Al this does it increase the time it takes me to review links to crappy sources that should never appear in mainspace. Guy (Help!) 23:24, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Keep The first three sources listed are Science (journal), Annals of Internal Medicine and Psychological Bulletin. Many more are similar. Other than a non-dominant amount of questionable Radin stuff, I don't see a lot of cruft here. Lou Sander (talk) 09:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.