Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Annika vaisanen

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 06:37, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

User:Annika vaisanen


Procedural nomination: declined db with reason "it is against the user page guidelines". initiated the speedy nomination. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. SPA promotion.  This user bio would be appropriate for a serious and regular contributor.  It is too promotional for a one-time contributor.  It is definately not OK for a non-contributor.  Agree that it falls short of WP:CSD, although not by far.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:08, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - This might be acceptable if the user had contributed more than not at all. WP:FAKEARTICLE.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 03:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per SmokeyJoe! -- Klein zach  05:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.