Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Anocular/new article name here

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 14:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Anocular/new article name here


WP:NOTMADEUP. No coverage in reliable sources. North America1000 12:17, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Blank but accept Delete. Does not potentially contribute to an encyclopedia. I know that is not a deletion criterion but that is what I think. No need for deletion because it can be blanked (or even left alone). (I am going through a few MFDs just to see what I think). Thincat (talk) 14:45, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is nothing there in this six year old draft and the one single website link is dead now. If any person thinks there's something here, that person can create that another unsourced version for this fictitious device without an idea what source of fiction we are talking about. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.