Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Anthony Ennis




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. @harej 00:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

User:Anthony Ennis
User's only edit, made two years ago, was to write this shrt story in the sandbox. Another editor thoughtfully moved it to the author's userspace, but Wikipedia is not a webhost for showcasing literature. Had the material been left in the sandbox, it would have been wiped away automatically. -- bd2412 T 16:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Irbisgreif (talk) 07:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete User has had enough time to grab a copy if he so desires. Does not meet the user page guidelines otherwise. Gigs (talk) 00:06, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Blank. There is no benefit in bringing such innocuous stuff to MFD.  Having it buried in a userspace history, much as it is buried in the sandbox history, has no downsides.  Bringing it to MFD is to pollute MFD with trivia.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Userspace is not for your creative writing projects. GrooveDog (oh hai.) 22:17, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.