Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Antidiskriminator/Drafts of articles/List of notable dead people with anti-Serb sentiment

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Redirect to Anti-Serb sentiment. — xaosflux  Talk 15:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

User:Antidiskriminator/Drafts of articles/List of notable dead people with anti-Serb sentiment


There is so much wrong with this. Putting dead people on a list by what group they don't like is a little much, and lining them up with Hitler is over the top. No encyclopedic topic. Legacypac (talk) 02:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * One of many draft and actual WP:COATRACKs in the Balkans area. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep, but merge to talk page of the relevant parent article. Not so indisputabley unsuitable.  WP:COATRACK implies care is required.  Move all to a new section at Talk:Anti-Serb sentiment.  Spinout articles, especially possibly WP:NPOV issue spinout articles, should begin from the main article where interested editors can see what is happening.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes this user has a few like this. This looked to be the most problimatic at quick glance, and a good test case. Legacypac (talk) 04:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I think, abandoned material so closely related to an article, possibly partly suitable for inclusion in the article or as a spinout article, would in general be best merged to the article talk page. The policy supporting this would be WP:PRESERVE.  Is it agreeable for you to merge and redirecting these things to a talk page section, where appropriate?  I don't anticipate objection from the talk page, but would be interested in hearing about it if it happens.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Sounds pretty reasonable to me. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Entries added to article.--Z oupan 11:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * You mean here?. That would mean merge and redirect and make better effort at the target to record attribution (erring on the side of compliance). --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: I don't see the encyclopedic value in this article. If the information is really encyclopedic, it should be merged to Anti-Serb sentiment, but I'm sceptical about that merge.. Chrisw80 (talk) 22:47, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I posted a note at Talk:Anti-Serb_sentiment. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.