Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Antron Wright

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:34, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

User:Antron Wright


personal website usage, possible advertising Aunva6 (talk) 03:57, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unless the user moves it to a private sandbox and re-writes it such that it can be considered for inclusion as a mainspace article. Otherwise, a violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST. hmssolent \Let's convene My patrols 13:17, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per HMSSolent. This is the user's only contribution to WP.  Klein zach  16:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete The individual seems to meet WP:N guidelines based on these claims, but I can't verify a single one of them. I've checked all-time pro football databases and a report on the 1998 Heritage Bowl with no mention of an Antron Wright, leading me to believe this is either a hoax or just a non-notable person. --BDD (talk) 00:21, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I found a news article from 1998, which verifies most of the bio, but he doesn't seem to be notable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aunva6 (talk • contribs) 00:47, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - the Society of Professional Journalists is hosting this collection of news articles about Wright and the ongoing investigation into his school. This article is more of the same but it confirms (among other things) that he did play (though "minimally") for the Baltimore Ravens which means he probably passes WP:NGRIDIRON. But the articles alone means he probably passes WP:GNG. I'm happy to "adopt" it and publish it. Stalwart 111  01:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I should say I would be happy to "adopt" it and publish it if people agree with my assessment of GNG and if people think there is some value in doing so. Given the coverage of him, even an NPOV article would be fairly disparaging and I'm not one for publishing such things just for the sake of publishing them, especially with regard to BLPs. So if there is a want for someone to publish it, I will do so. Otherwise, just let it disappear. Stalwart 111  06:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.