Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AppleSocialUK/James Kenny

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

User:AppleSocialUK/James Kenny


Obvious WP:NOTAWEBHOST violation on a promotional account name. Mr Kenny's website & social media profile is completely non-notable. His Youtube channel has 13 subscribers. His blogspot site has a handful of posts and looks deader then dead. The 10th hit when you search AppleSocialUK leads to a phishing site. This topic is the absolute opposite of a social networking site because no one is paying attention to it. User:Cryptic removed the CSD tag with no explanation but perhaps he can enlighten us why he sees so much potential here. Legacypac (talk) 05:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as none of this is acceptable at all. SwisterTwister   talk  05:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Of course it has no potential, but it's not a U5 and you know it. Otherwise you would have just tagged it instead of deceptively removing the draft tag that disqualified it as such too.  Delete after it gets its 7 days of fame on MFD. —Cryptic 05:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * You are just rude and don't AGF. I'm just using Twinkle. Legacypac (talk) 09:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I tested this and can confirm that Twinkle automatically removes the draft template when CSD tagging. Someone should raise that issue with whoever maintains Twinkle. A2soup (talk) 16:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Brought up at Wikipedia_talk:Twinkle. Anyone with a GitHub account can report it directly if they would like. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:06, 30 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'd can see a U5 but people disagree so moving on, it's fair for an MFD and deletion. There's no indication that a mainspace version ever came about and while I'd probably vote to blank it normally but given the inappropriate username and little information and possible COI, deletion makes more sense. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Some admins CSD-ing liberally might have accepted either U5 or G11, but CSD criteria are supposed to be interpreted conservatively.  Calling "promotion!" on Bio stubs is generally a grey area of bad form.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.