Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Apteka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Delete Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 19:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Apteka
Inappropriate use of user space. Non-English (apparent) copy-paste of some other site without proper attribution. Bringing here as speedy deletion was declined. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. Large amount of material deposited, not in English.  User, edited once only 2 September 2007, is possibly the same person as User:Macence, a two-day editor 18-19 June 2008.  Advise user to read Alternative outlets.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:25, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment -- our cross-wiki contributions tool is not working today but will probably be back to normal in a few days (this happens sometimes). Check then to see if Apteka or Macence are active on other projects. If so, leave queries on their other talk pages. Otherwise, blank and leave a note on the two en.wikipedia talk pages. Also, should Macence be speedied now as a copyvio? Probably should advise both contributors on WP:COPYRIGHT. -- A. B. (talk • contribs) 14:53, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete seems to be mostly the same content as User:Vokcan and much of it seems to be copied from and some other posts from the same blog. Especially given the broken formatting, its a likely copyvio. Mr.Z-man 23:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Mr. Z-Man's discovery of probable copy-vio. Raven1977 Talk to me My edits  22:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I can't see the copyvio - could you spell it out. Thanks AndrewRT(Talk) 18:35, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well some of it was in the comment above mine, see . That's enough for me to err on the side of caution, and delete the page. Raven1977 Talk to me My edits  15:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Have you actually read that page you cited? I have and can't see any common text at all. This isn't so much as erring on the side of caution as sentencing someone based on rumour. AndrewRT(Talk) 21:21, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.