Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Aradic-es/Future aticles/UK during destruction of Yugoslavia



User:Aradic-es/Future aticles/UK during destruction of Yugoslavia

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was

Deleted (can be restored or copied if ever needed) Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:18, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Second copy: User:Aradic-es/future articles/United Kingdom and destruction of Yugoslavia

deletion to remove an archive of the attempt at recreating a deleted article. See Articles for deletion/United Kingdom during Yugoslav wars. In the userspace of a permanently "an indefinitely" blocked user --Polargeo (talk) 20:23, 8 December 2009 (UTC) Also appears to be another copy under a slightly different name User:Aradic-es/future articles/United Kingdom and destruction of Yugoslavia Polargeo (talk) 20:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It is unlikely that a person while indefinitely blocked can do much with the material, to be sure, but as we are unaware of what, if any, arbcom review will occur, it is premature to say the person is now a non-person.  We should always be aware that "indefinite" has a different meaning from "permanent" on WP.   Collect (talk) 20:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete both  Indefinitely blocked users don't need drafts that they can't work on. Deletion isn't permanent either, if they get unblocked in the future they can request undeletion. If some users thinks this stuff has value, they are welcome to move it. Miami33139 (talk) 20:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete both Good point, Miami33139. This draft could always be restored by an admin if the user's indefinite block is lifted. Keeping it in his userspace in the meantime is certainly not helpful, particularly given the strong consensus to delete at the AfD cited above. If a user other than Aradic-es is interested in working on this, they'd be better off requesting undeletion of the article at WP:UNDELETE or asking the deleting admin to give them a copy of it. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 22:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.