Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Arilang1234


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Keep. It was inappropriate to nominate this user page for deletion; the editor is active and at least some of the content clearly is appropriate for a user page. If some of the content is considered inappropriate for a user page, that should be discussed with the editor before nominating the page for deletion. See also Editors matter. Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

User:Arilang1234
A large portion of the user page appears to be soapboxing. Its main purpose appears to be to portray people of Manchu ethnicity in the worst possible light. There are numerous spam links that fit in with the point of view being conveyed. -- Albert584 (talk) 05:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - I don't see any issues. Am additionally somewhat concerned about a user with <50 edits making this nom. // roux   05:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Strike out problematic sections - Some sections obviously need to go, e.g. the section on "Manchu massacres". There are also superfluous items that are just taking up space and probably should be reduced or eliminated to reduce load time. However, the parts about articles the user has created, etc. can stay as they are legitimate. Outright page deletion shouldn't be needed provided that the user concerned doesn't try to insert problematic material in the future.
 * Note that an IP editor had already removed a quote containing the word "barbarian" because it was considered soapboxing. 213.114.201.43 (talk) 06:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * strike out the names, like "manchu massacre", but allow him to keep the links.07:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.83.128.88 (talk)


 * Suggest we ignore the above comments by IPs, with less than a dozen edits between them, and one of them whose only edits are to this page. // roux   07:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.