Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Armanaziz/sandbox/Translation

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete, user request speedy deletion (well.. speedy after one month :-). Nabla (talk) 11:42, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Armanaziz/sandbox/Translation


"Fake article" - Wikipedia isn't a storage place for someone's translation attempt. Dougweller (talk) 13:32, 15 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Valid use of userspace - Wikipedia does not require user sandboxes to be articles, the "article" does not hit the "stale" ("indefinite storage") category either as having been edited in the past two months. No actual strong reason for deletion, thus default to Keep.  Propose again if it dormant for six months or so. Collect (talk) 16:26, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is per WP:WEBHOST. Sandboxes are for the purpose of the encyclopedia. There is no indication that the editor intends to (or can) make this into an article at any point given the months this translation has been ongoing. And an inappropriate is an inappropriate use, it doesn't need to be inappropriate and stale but stale userspace drafts lend itself to being webhost concerns. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:48, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * You mean, not counting their edit on 27 November?   4 days != "stale" last I checked. Collect (talk) 12:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * That edit doesn't make it more likely to become an actual article here. It's just a continuation of the editor's work there. Plus I'm not even sure what is gained by having the editor change "Kind" to "merciful" and whatever else they are doing. Again, it's not about stale, it's inappropriate if the editor just did that last edit, the length of time does not make this more appropriate somehow. What do you imagine this userspace page could be useful for? I can't think of any use for a single editor's personal translation of the Quran that isn't just hosting something that could be done on a notepad file on their computer. Any article based on this would be deleted as original research almost immediately. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:53, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * While these translations cannot be quoted, they can be good inline paraphrasing. –  nafSadh  did say 12:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - If this were left for months and months I'd understand but it seems to be updated a lot, I'm not entirely sure the point of it but if it's in the sandbox and out of harms way then I see no reason for deletion. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  08:35, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - G7 - Well since nom's moved it elsewhere this may aswell be speedied..... – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  09:28, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - I am the author of the page and I understand wikipedia sandbox was not the best place for my excercise. I have moved my work. Please feel free to delete the page. -  Arman  ( Talk ) 09:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.