Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Armorgeddon199/Swagmaster

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

User:Armorgeddon199/Swagmaster


WP:NOTURBANDICTIONARY. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:24, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Blank. Not worth MfD. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:28, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's here, it will never be a suitable article, and it's also inaccurate. Swagger is not a 21st century word. KJP1 (talk) 05:57, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Swagmaster has About 199,000 ghits, and about 735 googlebook results. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:24, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete unimproved since 2011 and extremely unlikely to ever become an appropriate Wikipedia article. clpo13(talk) 05:59, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - What on Earth is the point to blanking, and keeping a blank page forever? Robert McClenon (talk) 00:52, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If deleted, it is kept forever too. The difference is the waste of time fuss with processing it to the standard for deletion.  The issues is addressed by the very simple policy at WP:ATD.  I admire wikipedians who do cleanup, but disparage wikipedians who want forum attention for doing it.  How many old worthless harmless pages do you think are in userspace that people like jjjdddd would bring to mfd?  In the end, is it a net positive or negative to create an mfd discussion for each?  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:13, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I say either keep it or delete it, but do something and be done with it. Blanking is pointless. Could you imagine if we did that for other things (articles that would be deleted, drafts, etc.)? Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 04:30, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * That’s an old resolved question? Are you really asking why deletion is more important in mainspace than userspace?  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:43, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Even if bringing this crud to MFD is a net negative, the crud itself is also a net negative. Once the crud is brought to MFD, we might as well put it in a bit bucket.  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:25, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep and blank., I brought a bunch of these things to MfD, too, when I first got started in userspace cleanup not all that long ago. There just isn't the consensus to delete harmless stuff. If it's eligible for CSD U5, just tag it. deletes anything borderline eligible by his own admission, and I've seen  nuke them a couple of times when I've nominated several dozen of them at once. But really, bringing these things here (and thus requiring us all to vote on them instead of doing other things) is a waste of time and, by that measure, does more harm to the project than keeping blank pages with benign histories in userspace ever will. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:40, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete for goodness sake. Untouched for more than seven years. Of course it is a CSD U5 candidate. Even patent nonsense would do. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:38, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.