Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ash/Clay Maverick




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep Consensus is clear, and in accord with policy. DES (talk) 21:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Ash/Clay Maverick
Userfied because it's an "unsourced negative BLP" when to me it reads more like an ad. Or at least it did until Sccott McDonald blanked it. What's the point? Either move it back to article space or wipe it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:24, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You are being, shall we say, overenthusiastic. Had you taken a bit more time to look at what was going on you would realize that the page has only just been userfied to my userspace. Refer to User talk:Scott MacDonald or take two seconds to read the edit comment Scott gave in page history (diff) if you are not prepared to accept this on good faith. I could do without the hassle, go away and do something more productive. Cheers Ash (talk) 07:38, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is no problem with keep the page blanked.  User:Ash appears to be a serious editor in good standing, and he doesn't need his userspace micromanaged.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep As a strong point - this is one of the reasons for userspace.  Collect (talk) 14:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is the beauty of the userspace. Samwb123T (R)-C-E 22:29, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.