Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AssumeGoodWraith/Editnotice

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 21:52, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

User:AssumeGoodWraith/Editnotice

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Misleading claiming that a user is blocked Qwv (talk) 18:37, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: Technically it does say that the user isn’t blocked. If I had to guess this could possibly be a draft for an edit notice. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 19:42, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Question: Did you bother to contact this still active user about this apparently humorous user subpage? (I mean, before you nominated their userspace for deletion?) BusterD (talk) 19:55, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It does seem like the user is on a break right now. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 20:59, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * My question remains. Was there any prior attempt to contact the user before nominating the user's subpage? I'm not seeing any. User:AssumeGoodWraith edited last Friday. Since there's exactly nobody yet injured by this template draft, therefore no hurry, I would think a simple query would have demonstrated assuming good faith, before we got here. BusterD (talk) 22:06, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes I do agree with you. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 00:40, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - Wait until the user comments. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:13, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.