Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Aussie and Proud/Aussie and Proud




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. --Killiondude (talk) 06:06, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

User:Aussie and Proud/Aussie and Proud
This is a userpage that is entirely unrelated to Wikipedia, seemingly violating User page. I had concerns that this may even be a draft for an article about a non-notable social networking site so I have raised the matter on the author's talk page, but he has not responded in six days, although he has edited Wikipedia in that time. --AussieLegend (talk) 13:35, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Advert page for a spam username.  Triplestop  x3  03:26, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Nothing wrong with the username, although if there is, the user should be referred to Changing username. I am concerned that, firstly, the page in question states that it refers to a group, as usernames must belong to individuals, and secondly, that it promoting something.  Probably, this problem is inherent, can't be fixed by editing, and so should be deleted.  I see that the user is a newcomer, has attempted to make constructive edits, and is currently blocked.  Can we please try to be nice to newcomers.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:18, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * We tried to be nice to this guy from the start and he went from just being aggressive to this. Why else do you think he was blocked? --AussieLegend (talk) 09:33, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * That was unacceptable real world threat. He should be blocked indefinitely, not with an expiration.  Perhaps he might apologise in an unblock request.  I have complained to the blocking admin.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:51, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - vanity "article" about non-notable group; and leads me to believe that the main account should have been blocked as a role account, although the username by itself was certainly unexceptionable. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Orangemike and Triplestop. Any chance we can find a way to get rid of that image too? Glass  Cobra  18:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.