Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Austinaaronson/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. I'm not aware of any precedent for salting a user's sandbox, or for salting a related page (the "real title", presumably in mainspace) that has never been created, so I'm going to refrain from that. However, recreation of the same content at any page name would be subject to WP:G4 speedy deletion. RL0919 (talk) 05:15, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

User:Austinaaronson/sandbox


I'm tempted to call this WP:G11-worthy, but it's more negative than promotional. In any case, clearly fails WP:NCORP. This was deleted once under WP:U5 as User:108.189.107.167/sandbox; the current article is an identical copy. Not to mention the promotional username, and undoubtedly WP:COI and/or WP:UPE.

The previous WP:U5 makes this ineligible for WP:CSD again, so bringing it to WP:MFD where hopefully not too much time will be wasted on it. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotion, a woeful failure to meet WP:CORP, and by a WP:SPA. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt the real title. Wikipedia is not for advertising.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Delete and SALT. G11 would have still worked fine with a SALT template. Lapablo (talk) 05:57, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.