Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AwesomeMattSinegar

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  LITERALLY speedy delete.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 16:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

User:AwesomeMattSinegar

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Homophobic, xenophobic and misogynistic spam. Suggest user to be indeffed. Ricciardo Best (talk) 08:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. Always nice to tell the user on their talkpage you're deleting their page after nominating it. No prior attempt to contact the user. User removed nominator's request for speedy deletion. I've left a mild template on their talk, but notifying the user of this process appropriately isn't optional and is on the nominator. BusterD (talk) 09:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Requested U5. I hadn't seen this MfD. U5 applies and the page creator can't (must not) remove the tag. —Alalch E. 14:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Someone tagged for WP:U5. I've not honored it. Really think Ricciardo Best assessment is overboard. Looks to me like user 1) is not overly mature and 2) thinks this is a webhost. --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter what Ricciardo wrote as his reason to nominate in this this MfD. We don't have to debate that. This is a page in userspace consisting of writings and information not closely related to Wikipedia's goals, where the owner has no edits outside of user pages. It's also self-promotional.—Alalch E. 14:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I'll probably circle back to it if no one else gets it. I left him a message. Thinks we're FaceBook or something. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * He
 * s panicking -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Now there
 * s two user page warnings casue I missed BusterD's -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:34, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * FYI, User:Anthony Bradbury just speedied under the applied U5. So this can be closed as delete. I wish this could have been more civil towards the user, even if the page violated policy. BusterD (talk) 15:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * There was some delay and uncertainty in expediting this page's deletion, due to the creator's removal of speedy deletion tags, on one hand, and the nominator's response to this which was to start an MfD which gave the creator an opportunity to be disruptive in the MfD and get extra warnings. All of this, especially the delay, caused the creator to become probably much more agitated than they would have been. —Alalch E. 15:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes. Probably best to politelt retag and explain why not to remove CDS tags. While omitting the commentary above
 * . -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.