Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Axem Titanium/Yu-Gi-Oh: The Abridged Series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep--Aervanath (talk) 15:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

User:Axem Titanium/Yu-Gi-Oh: The Abridged Series
Abandoned user subpage, used as a draft of an article which has been deleted many times and considered unacceptable. See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:I am ironbatman/Yu-Gi-Oh! the Abridged Series. Stifle (talk) 11:26, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, why is this being nominated for deletion? First of all, this is a user subpage. Someone else added a copyvio image but I removed that and there is nothing else wrong with its existence; I can use it however I like, within limits, according to WP:USER, and I don't seem to be violating any of the items listed there. It is clearly not abandoned since there are people who have edited it as early as the day that you nominated it for deletion. As for the previous AFDs, WP:CCC and the main purpose of this subpage is to find reliable sources referencing this show and proving its notability. As you can see from the references section, I've found a couple non-trivial sources and someone even added one that they found. Also, there is a substantive difference between my subpage and the other subpage mentioned so arguments that appeared on that MFD can hardly be applied here. Axem Titanium (talk) 16:42, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as a user subpage or sandbox this is acceptable use: a near miss of an article. Although it would not make an article at this point in time we can consider it as a practice page, or even userfication of deleted material. (though I don't know if it was userfied). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * For the record, this page is entirely original material. I didn't actually realize that YGO:TAS had an article until after it was deleted (and rightly so, because it clearly lacked sources at that point). Axem Titanium (talk) 22:21, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Experienced user knows what he is doing.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:29, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Valid use of userspace, and userspace does not require that it only have "acceptable articles" in it. Collect (talk) 19:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.