Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:BWDP/McDojo

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep for now  Skier Dude  ( talk  00:57, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

User:BWDP/McDojo
Article was userfied on BDWP's request a month after being deleted after discussion at Articles for deletion/McDojo (2nd nomination) at the end of May. Since the article was userfied, two months have gone by with zero edits except for removing the AFD headers and commenting out the categories to prevent this userfied article from appearing in encyclopedic categories. Considering the zero edits that have occurred to indicate work to improve the article for a potential future return to mainspace, I believe this userfication at this point runs against WP:FAKEARTICLE, where the main purpose of userfying appears in this case to be to indefinitely host deleted content, essentially doing an end run around the community consensus to delete at the end of the AFD. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:08, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Weakish keep - it's only been two months since userfied, and user seems to be on a break. I've tagged with userspace draft which should remove from Google results. – xeno talk 16:23, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep in principal I cannot find an exact definition of a time frame to use. But in spirit i feel 2 months (especially during the summer breaks) is a bit too short of time in these cases. Article has been tagged as a user draft, so a bit more time could be allowed i think. Ottawa4ever (talk) 21:01, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Per both above.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 04:21, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Xeno's tag. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  04:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: As with some other recent noms for userfied material I base my "keep" on the fact that in past discussions about userfied material I was chastised for wondering if one such userfied article, sitting since 2006, should be deleted. While there were varied thoughts on "how long is too long" the one thing that was accomplished was a template: userfiedpage. Aside from that the is also the concept about Article incubation which contains the thought that Articles in incubation get the benefit of collaborative editing which rarely happens to articles in userspace. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:08, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Renominate in a few months I participated in the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/McDojo (2nd nomination), where I was unable to find secondary coverage for this article which existed in an original research state for years. I doubt that the topic will become notable anytime soon, so I support the deletion of this draft per WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST. However, because the consensus is against deleting this page after two month's time, I would recommend that renominate this page in a few months (perhaps four months). After six months of this draft circumventing community consensus at the AfD, I believe that the consensus at MfD will be to delete this page, as well as User:Nate1481/Bullshido.net, User:Nate1481/McDojo, and User:Nate1481/Bullshido. Cunard (talk) 02:52, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. Potential, albeit weak, and too little time since last edit to consider it abandoned.-- SPhilbrick  T  23:12, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.