Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bahamut0013/Secret pages




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  withdrawn by nominator. Jamie  S93  02:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

User:Bahamut0013/Secret pages
Per the many nominates secret pages. Wikipedia is not a web host and should not motivate people to create this silly nonsense. I think of this page more of a "cheatsheet" and since they are not allowed on article space, why should we have them for wikipedians to waste their time play around with them?  Zoo Fari  00:40, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Balanced, useful, well-informed presentation of both sides on a contentious wiki-issue; I have cited it in an Arbitration Committee decision. I see no basis for objecting to this page, especially in userspace. Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:57, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Super Strong Keep OK you guys have gone too far. There is no way that this page should have even been NOMINTED. how does this violate WP:MYSPACE?-- Coldplay   Expert  01:26, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - just because the essay is against your viewpoint doesn't make it deleteable. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 01:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Withdraw Yes, I've gone too far.  Zoo Fari  01:59, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.