Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Barry Kibrick

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Move to draftspace . where it can either be loved and improved or expire in 6 months anyway. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:17, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Barry Kibrick


WP:FAKEARTICLE on userpage. Legacypac (talk) 05:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and per WP:NOTLINKEDIN. &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  05:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Borderline notable, promising draft.  Not written as promotion, but a fair attempt at a proper article, written in an historical perspective.  Barry Kibrick "is known for" a few things, according to google, and there are multiple mentions of him in mainspace already.  Keep the history for a future possible interested editor to put in enough effort to decide properly.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:45, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If it has potential, move to Draft space so someone can adopt it? Legacypac (talk) 07:01, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.