Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Beaneater00/Userboxes/Balkans/RSKRightofReturn

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

User:Beaneater00/Userboxes/Balkans/RSKRightofReturn

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Beside the issue of obscurity (as nobody is using it, with doubtful prospects for that to change), this userbox could be interpreted as inflammatory and divisive in the context of Croatia–Serbia relations. Sundostund (talk) 12:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete keep I don’t know what the heck this box is even going on about. Maybe it makes sense in context. In any case, weak delete due to being useless vanity creation of blocked user. Dronebogus (talk) 05:31, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * There are hundreds of thousands of refugees from Croatian War of Independence. I am not sure here. Should User:DieWeisseRose/Userboxes/PalReturn be deleted too? Researcher (Hebrew: חוקרת) (talk) 12:57, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * No, that’s fairly mainstream. Dronebogus (talk) 12:58, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The Palestinian right of return is seen as a "euphemism for the destruction of Israel", much more divisive than the question of Croatian and Serbian refugees. Researcher (Hebrew: חוקרת) (talk) 13:17, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I don’t really understand the Israel-Palestine dispute, so no further comment but I’ll change to weak keep Dronebogus (talk) 23:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep if I was a Serb in Croatia who had gotten expelled (or came from an expelled family) I'd like to return back to my ethnic lands. No Palestinian right of return userboxes would get deleted. That being said, the userbox's text could be rewritten to something simpler. Super   Ψ   Dro  14:13, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - as the editor is indeffed for socking. GoodDay (talk) 15:11, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is a troublesome political userbox, and I think these questions should go to an RfC on politics in userboxes.  These can be said to be unrelated to the goals of  of the project.  Others can say they are useful self-declarations of editor POV, especially when self-referential as opposed to labelling others.  Another opinion is that if the opinion is allowed to be written in prose in userspace, it should equally be allowed in concise form in a userbox.
 * The current activity and standing of the author should be completely irrelevant, unless the page is directly connected to their sanctions. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete as more troll coprolites. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.