Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bech86/ModyWorks

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Default keep. No consensus. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 16:18, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Bech86/ModyWorks
This page has not been materially updated since userfication in August 2009 per this deletion discussion which would otherwise have concluded "delete". Per WP:NOTWEBHOST, this page should be removed now. Bongo  matic  21:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE says, "While userpages and subpages can be used as a development ground for generating new content, this space is not intended to indefinitely archive your preferred version of disputed or previously deleted content or indefinitely archive permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia." (mine emphasized) This unused userspace draft of a previously deleted article about a non-notable record label violates the policy WP:NOTWEBHOST and should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 03:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Page is a fake article which has not been accepted (per AfD mentionied above). Johnuniq (talk) 05:00, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep This article is something I am working on, that is why it is in my userpage. I do not think it should be deleted, I should be able to keep editing it and adding references and reliable sources until the article is ready to be moved. I do not understand why Bongo  matic  is so intent on deleting this article and this one User:Bech86/Almamy but not ALL of the other articles in my userpage that I am editing and contributing to, since ALL of them are in the same status? Bech86 (talk) 21:35, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * keep I see no reason not to allow Bech86 to try to improve this article. Hobit (talk) 22:54, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Article was userfied close to a year ago, but this is not an abandoned WP:FAKEARTICLE. I have been adding references and actually edited and added references from reliable sources as of today.Bech86 (talk) 23:53, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.