Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Beckgl/new article name here




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. harej 00:43, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Beckgl/new article name here
Article in user space. Completely unsalvageable, as I have not been able to find a single reliable source, Another user and I have concluded that since there're no sources, this is not worthy of moving into article space or even keeping in userspace. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:46, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If this one can be substantiated, then keep it. Otherwise no. DS (talk) 00:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.