Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bedford/Intro

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy keep. Self-close per wp:snow (non-admin closure) Dronebogus (talk) 17:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

User:Bedford/Intro

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Vanity project of banned user. Dronebogus (talk) 00:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. This is very much worthless and unnecessary, especially in the context of recent CBAN of its creator. —Sundostund (talk) 00:32, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - What do you mean vanity project? It's an extremely average userpage. CBAN doesn't mean delete their userspace. Sometimes it means blank, but that's not what's proposed here. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 02:47, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep We don't delete banned users' userspaces just because they are banned.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:52, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep No valid deletion rationale. Banning someone does not mean we erase their userpage presence from existence. — PerfectSoundWhatever  (t; c) 20:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Seeing no issues with this one. Not promotional or out of scope for a past editor. A ban alone does not merit deletion of unharmful userpage. &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 07:21, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.