Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:BeeRotticci


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Blanked. Stifle (talk) 09:38, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

User:BeeRotticci
A fictional religion. I asked the user to delete it a couple of days ago, he has not responded so far. This is the users only contribution, has 0 google hits on "keakism" and violates several wiki-guidelines (WP is not a webspace, for example). Ironholds 20:37, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia isn't a webhost, and this user is using his page to post an essay on a fictional religion. Userspace can be used to help you in your work here, or can contain a little personal information. This is being used for neither of those things, thus its inappropriate. Also the user was given a chance to change this page, but they didn't, so WP:BITE doesn't apply in this situation.--SJP (talk) 08:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Blank page. Unlikely, but possibly an ill advised but good faith attempt to draft a geniune mainspace contribution.  As the text is not offensive, or an abuse of wikipedia, it was right to ask the user and wait.  Blanking the questionable content is the next least bitie step.  Blanking immediately would also be acceptable.  No need for these discussions to clear such text.  Sanction (block) the user or MfD the page only if the user returns and actively refuses appropriate advice.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:10, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.