Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Beebarose/Abstract art




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete - No response to a message 6 days ago and the consensus is clear from this and the other MfDs. Peripitus (Talk) 11:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

User:Beebarose/Abstract art
This and every other article at Special:Contributions/Beebarose. There has been a lot of this reported at MfD where users start copying huge amounts of content to sub-pages. The only response gotten was that these were temporary used in "translations." There is no reason for these to continue to exist, the users are not communicating back to the rest of the project. Miami33139 (talk) 05:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Snowy Delete per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Maynassar article copies and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wikidocster/(all). Still more egregious violations of WP:FAKEARTICLE during translation through a dubious method. Is there any need to go through the full seven-day listing period with these? A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 06:43, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.