Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:BellaFan262

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 01:28, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

User:BellaFan262


Definitely a violation of WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a blog host. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:12, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sorry to BellaFan262 but Wikipedia is not a blog really does apply in this instance.  Also, according to WP policy, user pages "should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia". Shearonink (talk) 04:36, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per Collect's comments below and maybe ask for some Teahouse or mentor assistance. Shearonink (talk) 21:13, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Is not an excessive fraction of the users edits.  Does not contain external links.  Does not seem to be presented for external purposes.  Seems to reveal the users interests related to mainspace pages - this is perfectly OK.  Many people do this in some format, most of them in a format more formal and boring than used here.  Overall, it does present information about the user that is relevant to her editing.  It would be better if it began with an introductory statement.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:14, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * It is presented for external purposes. The blogging has nothing to do with her actual content contributions nor her status as a user.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Hmmmm....I'm looking at it again in light of SmokeyJoe's comments above. If this editor changed the title from 'BlogSpot' then what is the real difference between this User page and other User pages (which are primarily about the editor themselves).  I have seen user pages with editors' interests/hobbies/pets/etc posted on them.  Also, BellaFan262's edits at User talk:BellaFan262 especially this one have some bearing on this discussion but perhaps it's not the information that is the issue but the way it's presented? Shearonink (talk) 05:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * There *is* a probem. BellaFan262 should know that she does not own her userpage, her talk page, or even any of her edits.  If she turns out to be a non-productive contributor, and need to be blocked, then this userpage will provide useful background.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Jasper, I could already tell that you think that. I am not convinced.  You may be right, but at the moment her editing interests seem to match the theme of her userpage blog.  I really don't see this blog as intended for an external audience.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:47, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: The page under consideration has been blanked by the editor so maybe this discussion has possibly been rendered moot... Perhaps if there are any mentors available they could take Bella under their wing for a short while, at the very least could maybe someone (else) notify the Teahouse?  I don't know what the TH templates are though and will be MIA from WP this weekend. Shearonink (talk) 13:42, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Productive editor. The user page presents information about the user that is relevant to the topics she likes to edit and/or conveys information about what Wikipedia topics she is interested in. WikiProjects like seeing such info on user pages because they use that to find new members to recruit. The title being 'BlogSpot' and the listings merely presents the user page in a less boring format. The user page is not extensive or excessive and there's no evidence that the page is for external purposes. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 08:29, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Moot Keep. Acceptable userpage of active non-vandal. User has since blanked the page though. IMO editors should find better things to do than hunt around for userpages to propose for MfD. --Surturz (talk) 05:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - The actions against the relatively new user BellaFan262 were overbearing and appear to have driven her away from Wikipedia as she blanked her talk page and her user page. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:09, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * But how will Jasper pass RfA if he hasn't brutalised enough newbs at MfD for WP:UP vios?? :-) --Surturz (talk) 12:42, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep (but politely ask editor to reduce image sizes of current page) The prior page was also within bounds. This is a reasonable use of userspace by an actual person who appears to be contributing to WP. Collect (talk) 11:47, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.