Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bellsforsashes/aaronpfenning

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Draftify. at proper name Draft:Aaron Pfenning. Will be properly searchable and can be worked on or moved to mainspace by anyone who wishes to work on it. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:46, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Bellsforsashes/aaronpfenning


WP:ABANDONED draft from 2010 recently sent to userspace by a user who has no intent to work on this. Either it belongs in mainspace or it deserves to be deleted as WP:ABANDONED. Very conveniently this was moved out of mainspace during a time I'm prohibited from moving it back. Legacypac (talk) 03:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment - See Requests for undeletion if interested in the reasons behind the restoration of this to the userspace. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 03:26, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank-you for providing the link. Legacypac (talk) 06:50, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - Deletion or a move to the mainspace are not the only options. No objection to blanking it with inactive userpage blanked. 1 hour and 1 minute after a draft has been restored is not the time to seek deletion. The user whose move of this page to the mainspace implied that they thought it was suitable for the mainspace is now seeking deletion. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 13:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Waste of time. My personal hound is still reviewing all my edits and can't be content with letting pages have their natural fate. Is the long gone creator coming back?. Legacypac (talk) 16:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I am all about throwing out the garbage but if someone thinks its salvageable and they want to work on it, what difference does it make to you in userspace? The creator isn't the only editor who is allowed to work on it... CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:50, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * He does not intend to work on it. He made that very clear in the restore request. Legacypac (talk) 21:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You missed my point, anyone can work on it. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:43, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Godsy has no intention of working on it. The creator is long gone. Except for this MfD no one else would know anything about it or have any good way of finding it. Even the title is not formatted properly. I thought the topic was notable enough for mainspace and support putting it back so everyone can work on it. 17:14, 23 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Plausibly notable.  Many sources, eg http://www.interviewmagazine.com/music/aaron-pfenning-rewards#_  Six mainspace pages mention him directly.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:50, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep and move back to an article, which is was earlier, although deleted via prod. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:54, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.