Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Benjah-bmm27/Diphosphorus tetraiodide

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was redirect. MER-C 03:23, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

User:Benjah-bmm27/Diphosphorus tetraiodide


Untouched from 2009 so stale and already moved to article space. EBE123 talkContribs 21:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * History Merge--Looks like Benjah-bmm27 created the mainspace article by copying this...thus, it needs a history merge. -- E♴  (talk)  22:10, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * A history merge will produce an outcome identical to if the user had wp:moved the page. The trailing redirect is unimportant, it can stay or go on the whim of the user.  Any user would do well to simply convert to a redirect to Diphosphorus tetraiodide.  User:Benjah-bmm27 might equally well choose to delete the draft.  There is no copyright issue as User:Benjah-bmm27 is the sole author of the draft, and the sole author of the version in userspace derived directly from the draft.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:55, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah- you are right. The history merge is not necessary. I spoke too soon. --  E♴  (talk)  02:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

I've redirected User:Benjah-bmm27/Diphosphorus tetraiodide to Diphosphorus tetraiodide, as suggested. --Ben (talk) 10:10, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.