Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:BennyReyesReturned/Class images


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was delete for privacy concerns.--Aervanath (talk) 06:11, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

User:BennyReyesReturned/Class images
Never going to be an article. User didn't seem to edit much other than creating this mostly. Also, third-party word usage and general language (ignoring the creepiness factor) seems to suggest possible details of a living minor which I think is just plain inappropriate. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC) "Principle #5: 'Reasonable efforts to discourage children from disclosing identifying personal information are appropriate.'""Proposed remedy #3: 'Users who appear to be children editing in good faith who disclose identifying personal information may be appropriately counseled. Deletion and oversight may be used in appropriate cases to remove the information.'"There is enough information on this page for someone (who is willing to do the research) to identify this user (or at least narrow down the pool of candidates to a few people); the combination of the name of the class, the name of one of the students, and the schedule of who picks him up is enough. Blanking would retain the information in the page history, so delete per Mgm and counsel the user, as advised by ArbCom. –Black Falcon (Talk) 18:00, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep "becoming an article" is not a requirement in userspace. Images are tagged for deletion, by the same nom.  "possible details of a living minor"  unless the minor is under 16  would not violate law in the US.  WP:CHILD allows children to edit, and as long as no "personal information" is involved, there is no problem. No reason for deletion. Collect (talk) 10:39, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The name of the class and when who picks him up are all personal information that can be used by unsavoury persons and the page doesn't even make it clear who on these images (if any) is the user. I doubt children of that age have the technical know-how to use the upload form properly which is the user's intended goal here on Wikipedia. - Mgm|(talk) 12:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * From Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Protecting children's privacy:
 * Delete There is more than enough on this page and the images to identify persons who most definitely appear under 18 years of age. The description on this image and this image leads me to believe that a minor did not upload them.—Sandahl (talk) 23:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No need to overreact in the general case, but photographs of other peoples children shouldn't be uploaded, and certainly shouldn't be encouraged, especially where there is a creepiness feel, as there is here.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:34, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as Wikipedia is not a free webhost. I am speedy-deleting the images now due to privacy concerns. Stifle (talk) 11:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.