Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Beowulph/Abusive users to keep an eye on

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was snow delete. BencherliteTalk 00:10, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

User:Beowulph/Abusive users to keep an eye on


WP:POLEMIC - We don't keep lists of "bad users". Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:54, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Additionally, it appears to have been listed before at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Psychonaut/User watchlist. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:58, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * That's because it was originally located at User:Beowulph\Abusive users to keep an eye on, with a backslash instead of a slash. Ever since the creation of MS-DOS in the middle 1980s, people have been confusing slashes and backslahes. J I P  &#124; Talk 20:10, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:POLEMIC and WP:DENY. Achowat (talk) 13:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete We don't allow "shit lists" in userspace and this user has been inactive for about four years, witht he exception of on edit in 2010, so it is likely they really don't care anyway. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:05, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia has ways to work with users whose behaviour falls below certain standards. Personal userspace lists like this is not one of the ways. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:21, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. A personal "bad user" list is controversial by itself, but as well as that, neither of the IPs listed has edited anything in five years, and User:Beowulph himself hasn't edited anything in two years. This page is obsolete, useless, and potentially even harmful. J I P  &#124; Talk 17:41, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Keep such lists, if you must, off-site.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:01, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. I considered speedying it, but after six years, another four days shouldn't matter too much. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:54, 10 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.