Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bffo/Bioinformatics Links Directory

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:45, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

User:Bffo/Bioinformatics Links Directory

 * —  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 02:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * —  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 02:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

An abandoned effort that reads a bit like an ad or reflection on how the user and others developed some system. Lacks sources and is not written in suitable tone for a Wikipedia article. U5 was declined so bringing for discussion. Legacypac (talk) 02:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete This qualifys for G11 but an admin has declined a speedy on this page already. CoolSkittle  (talk) 02:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as crud. Perhaps we need WP:CRUD.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. That was definitely a bad U5 tagging, U5 does not apply.  Neither does G11 apply.  The page is not crud, is experienced Wikipedians should not so casually throw around denigrating aspersions.
 * The topic is plausibly notable.
 * * https://links.bioinformatics.ca/
 * * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1160270/
 * There is no reason to delete. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:27, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment After being inactive since May 2017, the author made one edit yesterday to Canadian Bioinformatics Workshops, a page they created. Author may come back to work on this if the page is kept. CoolSkittle  (talk) 18:07, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. The editor is not inactive per the recent edit, and given that the edit summary indicates the directory is now offline, there's probably no need to worry about it being promotional. --RL0919 (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 02:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Why dig around in users' directories looking for random subpages to meddle with? It seems beyond pointless.  Obviously this page would be a lot more appealing if it had some meat... it's a pity we don't have a Miscellany for Completion to propose this to instead. Keep per RL0919. Wnt (talk) 11:53, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * this comes from a long standing project to clean up spam, copyvio, hoaxes etc and sometimes surface good pages. You can participate here WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Stale drafts Legacypac (talk) 19:43, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If you want to nominate that page for MfD, I would have to agree. The idea that half-done Wikipedia userpage content is a bad thing is just wrong.  But as the page this MfD is about is not spam, copyvio, or hoax, I don't see this deletion as contributing to its nominal goal. Wnt (talk) 00:59, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry you seem to be a fan of copyvio, spam and hoaxes in userspace. Legacypac (talk) 02:15, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * That is not a reasonable post. Nothing is stopping anyone from tagging WP:CSD#G12, #G11 or #G3 any copyvio, spam and hoaxes in userspace.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.