Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bgoode2006/sandbox/Beanulator

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  '''No consensus. Default to keep'''. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:03, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

User:Bgoode2006/sandbox/Beanulator


This will never be viable to become an article, fails WP:N. Not worked on since 2013, contrary to WP:NOTWEBHOST. P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment - WP:N doesn't apply to userspace drafts, Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 58. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 13:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I know that, but it supports the argument that this page will never become a mainspace article, hence the deletion nomination. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:17, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Most stuff in draftspace will never become articles. Much can however be merged into articles.  "This one included. Not worked on since 2013" does not make something NOTWEBHOST violating.  Many articles have not been worked on for longer.  The project is slowing down, but deleting the slow stuff is not the answer.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, leave it alone. Don't even blank. Historical, not promotion, useful information for mainspace even if for integration into another article.  WP:N only speaks to where the topic should be a standalone article, and asking WP:N in drafts is a waste of effort.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:48, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Bah, extreme WP:Inclusionism. This will become the reason that at one point WP will become unmanageable. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:23, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose extreme inclusionism in mainspace, but userspace traditionally has a lot of leeway. Userspace becoming unmanageable? It is noindexed. We could lock down inactive users userspace by default, autounlocking when they log in. If there were to be a problem. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I do not identify with WP:Inclusionism, let alone extreme, but instead with Conflicting_Wikipedia_philosophies. This information in someone's userspace could prove beneficial to mainspace, and where it is it is doing zero harm.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.