Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bgoplin/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Bgoplin/sandbox


WP:STALEDRAFT nearly a year old. All sources are primary or unreliable (a press kit, for one). Wouldn't stand a chance in article space, with highly promotional tone and puffery out the wazoo. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:36, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * ETA: Also the user's only contributions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:37, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, there's no hope of progress here, it looks like the user has no other intentions other than to promote the subject. Fails WP:N. hmssolent \Let's convene My patrols 06:56, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Appears to be a fork of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sarah Lou Richards. It was a good faith attempt at writing an article.  A good faith COI SPA.  Refer to WP:BIO and Alternative outlets.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:13, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete clear case of WP:STALEDRAFT and long-absent user. -- Klein zach  09:41, 6 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.