Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bhupen80




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Generally if there is a problem that can be fixed by editing the page, it is not a reason to delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:27, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Bhupen80
The creator seems to be using this page simply as a webhost, and Wikipedia is not a place for free webhosting. If the user rewrites the page as a description of himself, I'll have no objections to it, but there's no way that the page (in its current state) passes our userpage guidelines. --Nyttend (talk) 00:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Many editors (likely about 6,000 or more) have short amonts of material about their family tree or the like. Nor excessive by any stretch,  and to call a few hundred words in the form of a listing of some ancestors a "webhost" issue cheapens the argument too much.   Reasonable use of Userpage entirely. Collect (talk) 11:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * See his reasoning in the first paragraph: "So i have decide to put whatever I know on here so that my future generations will have no trouble tracing their roots". Sounds like "I'm going to use this website to post my genealogy". Nyttend (talk) 16:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * How many words it the entire page? How many words are on this page? Collect (talk) 21:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete As it stands, it is just using wikipedia as webhosting. If it is re-written in a considerably more concise form, however, I'd have no objections. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RoadieRich (talk • contribs) 21:11, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep It's only a short little thing. No harm here.Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per the statement quoted by Nyttend but no real harm otherwise.  fetch  comms  ☛ 23:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Deletion rationales are shaky and admit that the page can be modified to comply with userpage standards. Correspondence should be established with the user to reach a compliant version.--WaltCip (talk) 01:57, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - User space is reserved for information relevant to the project. This is just someone talking about their own family history. --Mblumber (talk) 21:39, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:UP refers to excessive personal information, which this isn't. – Hysteria18 (Talk • Contributions) 02:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Blank and politely explain the specific concerns to the user. The user is new, the user page was created fairly recently, and an adequate effort to engage the user was not made (this notice and the MfD were only one minute apart). –Black Falcon (talk) 08:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.