Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bigge2win/LGO 2012 MIT 100K Ideas

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. User:Airplaneman has left an explanatory note on this editor's talk page, which will hopefully mitigate any semblance of officiousness. --RL0919 (talk) 22:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Bigge2win/LGO 2012 MIT 100K Ideas
Per WP:NOTWEBHOST. Airplaneman  ✈  21:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTMYSPACE. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  21:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * delete both look useless and game like. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. That has nothing whatsoever to do with building the encyclopaedia. Salvio  Let's talk 'bout it! 22:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Pause. We need not rush to delete a page that at present consists of two lines. It is obvious that this is a newcomer to Wikipedia who misperceives the permissible users of userspace by someone who is not contributing the encyclopedia. Best practice would be to leave him or her a message inviting him or her to contribute to the encyclopedia and set-up their contest coordination page elsewhere, rather than bewilder the newbie and potentially create dislike for Wikipedia forever by immediately slapping him or her with templates. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:45, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ Thanks for the much-needed heads-up, Brad. I should have done this when I nominated, and will remember to do this on future occasions. Airplaneman   ✈  04:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete But whoever deletes it should also explain to them why, gently, so that they don't decide that they never want to help Wikipedia or something like that.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 01:29, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree with Newyorkbrad. Consider, that just as we may perceive the management of commons (above MfD), through this interaction outsiders may perceive us as officious jerks.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:39, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.