Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Billfoldman/The fight card of my dreams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Delete Sedd&sigma;n talk 00:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Billfoldman/The fight card of my dreams
As per WP:NOTBLOG, WP:CRYSTAL, and WP:NOT E Wing (talk) 05:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:MYSPACE states that Wikipedia pages are not personal web pages... but they may be used only to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia, and this page clearly violates this. JulieSpaulding (talk) 12:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Tells us about the person (a valid use of userspace) and is not anything worse than that.  There is no requirement that userspace be encyclopedia articles, and such is not the practice as well.  No sound reason for deletion - default to Keep. Collect (talk) 14:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - usually I would have no problem with this but WP:UP states you should avoid substantial content on your user page that is unrelated to Wikipedia. Additionally, WP:UP states games, roleplaying sessions, and other things pertaining to "entertainment" rather than "writing an encyclopedia" should be avoided, which this page appears to be. JulieSpaulding (talk) 03:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - plus, I don't see how this tells us about the person. It appears to be a clear WP:NOTMYSPACE-type violation of WP:NOT. JulieSpaulding (talk) 10:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I think that is a misreading of User page. While the guideline does indicate that posting information about oneself is a valid use of userspace, it is for information that is relevant in the context of Wikipedia. To quote from the lead paragraph: "Your user page is about you as a Wikipedian, and pages in your user space should be used as part of your efforts to contribute to the project." (emphasis added). –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 19:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per JulieSpaulding and since the information is duplicated at User:Billfoldman, removing the need for a separate subpage. –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 19:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not offensive enough to delete.  Not ideal, but within reasonable leeway.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:23, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - blatant violation of WP:NOT and WP:UP, with a really pathetic "defense" of its existence on the bottom of the page. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:28, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.