Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Biofare/Biofare




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:30, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Biofare/Biofare
An obvious piece of self-promoting spam that was already speedy deleted, but is now incubating on this user page. The same-named account has identified himself as the creator of the Biofare blog, adding COI problems. Google News searches produce nothing to support WP:WEB. -- Warrah (talk) 21:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It appears to be promotional in nature, and the blog doesn't meet WP:WEB.  Them From  Space  21:43, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Promotional, unreferenced (unreferencable?), non-notable. I could go on, so I will. Fails WP:WEB, has a Conflict of interest, in violation of both WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:UP. It is being worked on, however it's not likely to meet notability guidelines soon/ever, and it's promoting the creator Wouldn't survive 150 seconds in mainspace, Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  20:46, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 06:35, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Many valid arguments are being made here, but the bottom line is this: we are not a webhost.   JBsupreme  ( talk ) 11:05, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.