Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Biofase/Userboxes/Hurt you

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. Creepy and weird but... CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 20:02, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

User:Biofase/Userboxes/Hurt you

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

"This user would like to hurt you" with the words "hurt you" wikilinked to tit torture fails WP:UP by advocating for violence. Likewise for "This user would like to tie you up." While the creator may have intended these userboxes as promoting consensual BDSM practices the userboxes give off a violent non-consensual vibe. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 09:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per "come on, really?". I've been avoiding these userbox MfDs because they just strike me as needless drama, but these are quite obviously referring to kink practices. I might find putting your kinks on your userpage a bit odd, but eh. I don't think these are so unacceptable within the context of userspace sexuality-related userboxes that they shouldn't exist within that quite libertine environment. Vaticidalprophet 14:41, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm not sure I agree that there's a non-consensual vibe based on aesthetic, but if there were any ambiguity, the links clear that up. As long as we're allowing sex-related userboxen, that should include BDSM-/kink-related ones. -- Tamzin (she/they) &#124; o toki tawa mi. 04:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I think this one crosses the line because it's an open statement to any woman reading the userbox that the person with the userbox would like to hurt them. It's misogynist and violent and creepy. It's not inherently the kink itself but the violent misogynistic vibe given off by the whole userbox. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 08:18, 28 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete What possible encyclopedic value do these userboxes serve?? Especially the first one--anything even remotely implying harm to another user should be deleted on the spot. WP is not the place to promote your sexual fetishes.Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 10:45, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Reword (and delete if not reworded) as while sexual userboxes by themselves are merely incredibly distasteful (but not subject to deletion), this crosses the line via its involvement/threats/whatever-you-want-to-call-it of the viewer, and should be reworded to simply indicate involvement/support/enjoyment of the mentioned activities. —  csc -1 01:56, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Meh. Edgy wording that comes off as kind of creepy at least. Perhaps not in the spirit of fostering community. I guess on these I come down on blank and allow the creator to reword if they really want to. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 01:18, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.