Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Biofase/Userboxes/Hurt you (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

User:Biofase/Userboxes/Hurt you

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Threatening, inappropriately sexual userbox. Simply stating you like BDSM is one thing (really if you just say “I like [x]” it’s not offensive at all imo unless it violates WP:NONAZIS or goes into explicit detail about sex acts) but this is basically sexual harassment towards any (female) contributors who stumble upon it. Dronebogus (talk) 23:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:51, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete not only for the disgust factor but as harassment and sexual harassment. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: Shouldn't User:Biofase/Userboxes/Tie you up be included here, as per the last MFD? —GMX(on the go!) 16:48, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * It’s somewhat tamer, if still really tasteless, I decided to leave it be and let someone else judge. Dronebogus (talk) 17:10, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I see this was kept previously (and surely the fate of a userbox with only a single transclusion by an inactive user is an eminently low-stakes matter), but on balance I find the delete arguments somewhat more convincing. The problem isn't the unorthodox nature of the activity described: it's the fact that it's directed at "you", i.e. the reader. I certainly see how that could make someone uncomfortable, and this isn't a case where the benefits (or lack thereof) outweigh that possible harm. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Reword to remove the references to the reader, which is what definitively pushes this across the line, but delete otherwise. —  csc -1 01:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.