Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bishop Walter Dixon

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete I see no reason to keep these blatant adverts a minute longer  Jac 16888  Talk 20:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Bishop Walter Dixon


Looks like an advertisement or at least a WP:FAKEARTICLE. Same problem with the associated talk page. Stefan2 (talk) 23:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

These user pages are all related:

-- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  02:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

(Also these associated Talk pages, which contain more of the same sort of information):

JohnInDC (talk) 16:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I really don't understand. I posted two images on my main page at the request of hundreds. Thanks, Bishop Walter Dixon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bishop Walter Dixon (talk • contribs) 00:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If it was hundreds outside of Wikipedia, then the user page was being used as web site for the benefit of hundreds outside of Wikipedia, which isn't allowed for user pages per WP:FAKEARTICLE (article space pages are for the benefit of those outside of Wikipedia and user pages are for the benefit of Wikipedians inside Wikipedia). To make matters worse, alternative accounts were open to benefit one user, raising potential issues of Sock puppetry, and one user account was open for use by multiple people User:Walter & Nyoka Dixon, again something not allowed because one person cannot be held accountable for the edits. To top it off, the user pages were quickly developed to convey information about you without much effort going into improving the encyclopedia, and that information reached excessive content unrelated to Wikipedia, which is not allowed per User pages. Then there's the issue of whether you in fact are Bishop Walter Dixon or merely someone posing as him and creating a Wikipedia user page as the Bishop Walter Dixon. It's not often a new user/two new users raise so many different alarms so quickly and you can see the reaction. All is not loss and I'd be happy to help you straighten this out later if you are here to help improve the encyclopedia (and not just in search of a web site page). -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 00:12, 17 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Someone has placed a speedy tag on Commons:User:Bishop Walter Dixon which is similar to this page. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:16, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * See also User:Archbishop Walter Dixon. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * It's much worse than that: User:Walter Dixon, User:Walter L. Dixon, Sr. and User:Archbishop Walter Dixon are the same content; User:First Lady Nyoka Dixon, User:Walter & Nyoka Dixon are clearly related and File:Image Of Bishop Walter Dixon.jpg, File:Baptist Archbishop Walter L. Dixon.jpg, File:Image of bishop walter dixon.jpg and File:Image Of Archbishop Walter Dixon.jpg are related images. Delete all and block users concerned. MER-C 03:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Indeed. And in some cases, there is also unnecessary text on the talk pages. Although talk pages normally aren't deleted, I think that we should make an exception delete some talk pages here. --Stefan2 (talk) 03:08, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, delete everything and let them get a fresh start with assistance of others if they so desire. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 00:19, 17 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:SPA and WP:FAKEARTICLE. I did a Google search and the subject seems not notable. --Surturz (talk) 03:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 6/15/2012 9:16 a.m. est. I have no problem in you deleting User:Archbishop Walter Dixon, User: Walter & Nyoka Dixon and User: Walter L. Dixon, Sr. Not understanding the posting procedure in addition to common. The only User I and my wife First Lady Nyoka Dixon want to be listed is User: Bishop Walter Dixon and User: First Lady Nyoka Dixon. I do not no how to delete the other three user. The images in user: Bishop Walter Dixon and First Lady Nyoka Dixon we want to remain. Some how I mess up in posting the images. Thanks.....Bishop Walter Dixon and First Lady Nyoka Dixon.
 * Delete - not notable and pretty plainly the result of some confusion about the nature of Wikipedia. JohnInDC (talk) 16:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete all - pure spam. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:33, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete all per WP:NOT - with all due respect, Walter Dixon, you appear to grossly misunderstand the purpose of this project. I would suggest MySpace, Tribe.Net or some similar site(s). -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  15:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete all - nn; Wikipedia is not a social networking site. Taroaldo (talk) 20:48, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete all - Wikipedia is not a place to host information pertaining to you, as an individual. Obvious misunderstanding about the nature of the Encyclopedia. Suggest a reading of WP:UP for the user. Achowat (talk) 15:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete all: Suggest to user wanting to keep them that they find sources to establish notability and create on main space in accordance with policy if it matters that much. --LauraHale (talk) 08:56, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.