Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Blackwatch21/Secret Page

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as U1. NAC. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 01:13, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Blackwatch21/Secret Page
The following pages are included in the nomination:
 * (the "real" secret page, which has now been converted into a redirect)
 * (the "real" secret page, which has now been converted into a redirect)

The arguments for deleting secret pages are summarized in the essay Why secret pages should be deleted. WP:UP states that examples of unrelated content to writing an encyclopedia are "Games, roleplaying sessions, secret pages and other things pertaining to "entertainment" rather than "writing an encyclopedia". Such activities are generally frowned upon by the community. Facetious games of no educational value relevant to the project are routinely deleted at MfD." WP:NOTMYSPACE states that "[t]he focus of user pages should not be social networking or amusement, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration." To the creator: in a July/August 2010 policy discussion (at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not/Archive 34), community consensus was that the policy What Wikipedia is not does prohibit secret pages. The deletion of this page is not a reflection on you; instead, it is a reflection of the changing community consensus that secret pages set an inappropriate ethos at Wikipedia. In that policy discussion, I wrote here about why all secret pages should be treated equally; whether a user social networks or does not social network on Wikipedia has no bearing on the fact that all secret pages should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 01:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all, not appropriate userspace pages. Nyttend (talk) 02:43, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all WP:NOT Secret account 04:15, 9 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Since consensus appears to be against these now.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 04:27, 9 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Just delete it, thats why I redirected it to my userpage. If you contacted me before hand I would of happily told you that, no need to create a whole deletion entry about it. Thanks.-- B lack W atch 21  23:23, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I would have contacted you as I did with several users if you had been active within the past week. I have tagged the pages for deletion per your request. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:27, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I check my talk page daily so I would have noticed a message, but anyway i agree with deleting them. Thanks.-- B lack W atch 21  23:30, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.