Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Blake/Pokémon League

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  nomination withdrawn. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

User:Blake/Pokémon League


2010 userspace draft that was already at Pokémon League until it was prodded, deleted and then made into a redirect and created there. A proposed spin-off article could be recreated but that hasn't been requested. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * This has nothing to do with the content that was originally at Pokémon League. I don't know if I ever personally saw that article before it was deleted.
 * This was created because list articles existed for the Gym Leaders of each region, ex: List of Kanto Gym Leaders, and the information for Elite Four members was rather large, but was included in List of Pokémon characters. So I was going to make a separate article for the information. Later, the lists of gym leaders were called for deletion and I added them here to make them all one article instead of multiple split lists. I rewrote and trimmed some of the information and attempted to search for sources, but was unsuccessful, and did not end up creating the article in mainspace. I'd rather it be redirected then deleted, but do what you will. Blake (Talk·Edits) 05:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Isn't this already done at List_of_Pokémon_characters? I mean if you're trying to spin that off that's one thing but it seems like it's already an article. There's some sources in this draft so a merge may be appropriate too if they are reliable. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Reasonable use of userpage by a productive Wikipedian. No need for interference.  I tagged the page with userpage, which is usually a good idea.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep if the author is planning to do something legitimately Wiki-related with it. Author is definitely active and has stated plans for it.  Personally, I think that's good enough for a keep in my opinion for userspace. Chrisw80 (talk) 02:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.