Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:BodhiVWorthy/Books/VaginaWorthy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Delete. This looks like simple vandalism. Ruslik (talk) 13:20, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

User:BodhiVWorthy/Books/VaginaWorthy
Looks like sort of marketing tool for an article tagged for speedy deletion. Purpse seems to me to be promotional in light of creator's other edits. Dloh cierekim  15:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)   Dloh  cierekim  15:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * It's not a marketing tool, please read the full context and text, it's a new way of thinking for people of all ages, the term Vagina Worthy will be a new phase of sexual evolution. I've taken off any links and or images to try to appease the wiki admin levels.BodhiVWorthy (talk) 15:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The whole thing reeks of promotional material. If it will be a new phase in anything, it will be notable and encyclopedic then. For now, after four deletions, it is not.  Dloh  cierekim  15:50, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per WP:NOT promotional, neologism, Original Research. Seems also to fail notability guidelines. Tonywalton Talk 16:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This is not Articles for deletion/Vagina worthy, and certainly what I see when I look at the page linked-to in the heading above is a user-space book made from Wikipedia articles, whose sole content is, and has ever been, our main page. As promotion, this page is a dismal failure.  Any non-administrators reading this probably don't have the first clue what the two of you are talking about (and are probably wondering why your rationales bear no apparent relation to the page at hand), let alone know what is being promoted here.  &#9786;  Uncle G (talk) 19:43, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, if you look at the 1) name of the product followed by the 2) catchy sales phrase in the light of the promotional nature of the deleted article, you get my drift. Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  13:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. While I have never fully understood the purpose of the Wikipedia Books system, most of the ones I have seen at least serve some purpose in gathering related articles together. This one does not: given the author's history, its sole purpose is clearly to attempt to introduce the term "vagina worthy" into Wikipedia. As we have no articles on this phrase (movement / way of thinking / phase of sexual evolution / whatever), there's no content here. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 23:40, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete What zetawoof said. No idea what this is even here for. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 18:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete WP is not a place to promote your views. It is an encyclopedia. — BQZip01 —  talk 16:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.