Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bonkers The Clown

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  RESULT: Keep. I am speedy closing this as per SNOW. The deletion criteria have been shown to have been used erroneously and I see no reason for any further discussion. violet/riga [talk] 21:06, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

User:Bonkers The Clown


This userpage is spam. It goes against the general rule that userpages should be related to the encyclopedia. This one is a WP:FAKEARTICLE with lots of jokey nonsense that is not suitable for Wikipedia. Beerest355 Talk 12:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 *  Oppose Keep Wide leeway is given to editors to decide what to put into their user spaces. This is obviously a joke and not a real article.  FAKEARTICLE applies when the user page is used to host a real article. Ryan Vesey 12:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - The user page is well under a thousand words and mostly focused on Wikipedia. It's fine. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:48, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, There's not one issue with this userpage at all, Infact it's the best I've seen here.


 * Beerest should read fake article before using it! & drop whatever stick he has with BTC. Davey 2010 T  13:31, 9 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep There's no attempt to present this as anything other than a humorous userpage; WP:FAKEARTICLE doesn't apply. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  14:17, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Since the only delete rationale is based on 1.) I don't like it and 2.) a policy which doesn't even support deletion of this page, this should be speedily closed. Let's not waste our time.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 15:36, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep you aren't supposed to have "extensive material unrelated to Wikipedia" on your userpage, but this isn't extensive by anyone's standards and isn't going to be mistaken for an encyclopedia article. Constructive contributors are given considerable leeway on this. Hut 8.5 16:13, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.